Is it right that someone's medical choice impacts on another?
Well the pro vaccine campaigners are convinced that we should all get vaccinated to protect those that can't and to increase the chance of 'herd immunity'
Both arguments are flawed. I have written before on asking one parent to risk the health of their child for that of the health of another. If the vaccine has awful side effects on the child that has to take it, then we end up with two sick children and if vaccines are so safe that you can give them to newborns and even to the unborn via the mother, then what's the problem with giving them to sick children whom we are told need protecting from these so called 'deadly' illnesses.
We don't know if the unborn are healthy or possibly developing a problem in the womb that then may be exacerbated by a vaccine at this all important developmental time.
As for the concept of 'herd immunity' this term was coined for natural immunity, where exposure to the virus as it would naturally enter the body would give protection and not necessarily exhibit the symptoms. The key point here, is how it would naturally enter the body and allow the immune system to work correctly and not by pass crucial stages.
But for those pro vaccine, they work on the basis that you need at least 95% of the population to be vaccinated to ensure that the virus is eradicated or at least minimised sufficiently.
So they want everyone, regardless of your own choice over your health, to be vaccinated to protect them.
The problem is that vaccines do not equal immunity. Vaccines fail, we know that because some of the largest outbreaks of the viruses vaccinated for at present appear in communities of either total or highly vaccinated areas. So perhaps they need lots of us to have them to account for the failure rate. If vaccines were 100% effective, the vaccinated wouldn't need to 'fear' the un-vaccinated and wouldn't require us all to be party to their regime.
Should people be subjected to this form of medical abuse? Surely making a medical procedure mandatory in a person with full mental capacity is abuse of the body. What are you going to do for those that don't want it - arrest them and force a vaccine into their arm??? can you just picture what kind of world and control that looks like? It should conjure up a very ugly scenario and totally inhumane.
So who is going to take the responsibility for vaccine damage under mandatory rules? Or will this only come about once governments think they have a way around it....under 3's perhaps are not eligible for government compensation etc etc, so when things go wrong, they can say it must be just part of natural development at that stage. or the excuse that this is when such problems could show themselves and nothing to do with the vaccine.....They sound familiar statements do they not?
So to all the pro vaccine and mandatory vaccine campaigners out there, I ask you to be careful what you wish for and where that can lead and what kind of world that looks like. Remove your ego from it, the bit that makes you think you are right and the rest should have no choice but comply with yours, then decide how you are going to inflict that on your fellow man, woman and child and you start to look like an SS guard!
After all fining people or putting them in prison isn't getting you to your ultimate goal of vaccinating everyone - for that to happen you have to carry out a medical procedure under their duress and with force.....that is when it starts to look ugly!
Those that are anti-vaccine or wish to choose which of the vaccines they get are less about stopping others and more about choice over their own health.
There is a very simple answer to this. Those that wish to be vaccinated should be, and quite rightly so! They should then get an antibody test and if immunity hasn't occurred, they could get the vaccine again, and they could keep repeating that until they show sufficient immunity. After all, they seem quite happy to take the vaccines and all the nasty adjuvants the rest of us choose to avoid, so rather than waste a procedure on those that don't want it, keep giving it to those that do until they are fully protected. Once they are fully protected they then have nothing to fear from the 'unclean'
Those of us happy to risk life and limb with measles or chicken pox or shingles or mumps etc etc are free to do so and would seek the help of natures medicine at that time, given the fact that the medical profession have nothing to treat these illnesses with anyway, hence their driving need to vaccinate for them. The fact that they are viral and antibiotics do not work on viruses, we need to go back to nature and find a good herbalist or homoeopath or orthomolecular practitioner to assist the body at that time.
Viruses are great at mutating to survive, so I just hope the vaccine makers are ready to respond when things like measles mutates and current vaccines fail. But of course they will be, a chance to make more money.
Or perhaps we all try and keep our immune systems as healthy as possible, the way nature intended and don't create a super measles virus etc.
There is a very strong theory that we might just be swapping childhood illnesses such as mumps, measles etc for more cancers, asthma, eczema, and other chronic illnesses that are in the rise as vaccines are on the rise.
So be careful what you think you want with regard to health, the long term scenario may not be desirable either in the administration of it or the consequences of mutation.
No comments:
Post a Comment